How to Check Sanctions
Sanctions screening is the process of checking whether the people and organisations you deal with
appear on government sanctions, export control, or restricted party lists. In most jurisdictions,
you are expected to screen before entering into a transaction or relationship —
and to keep a record that you did so. This guide walks through how to perform a sanctions check
and, critically, how to document your findings — whether you find a match or not.
This guide is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice.
Sanctions laws vary by jurisdiction — consult qualified legal counsel for your specific obligations.
Step 1: Understand why screening matters
1
Screening is a legal obligation in most jurisdictions
Sanctions regulations differ by jurisdiction, but the common thread is that compliance is your responsibility:
- US (OFAC) — strict liability applies. Violations can result in penalties even without knowledge or intent.
- EU — restrictive measures are updated frequently and apply to all EU persons and entities.
- UK (OFSI) — strict liability applies to financial sanctions breaches.
- Australia (DFAT) — autonomous sanctions and UN Security Council measures are enforced domestically.
Universities, research institutions, exporters, financial institutions, and any organisation
with international dealings may have screening obligations. Even where not strictly required,
screening and documenting your checks demonstrates good faith due diligence.
Step 2: Identify who to screen
2
Screen all parties, not just direct customers
Think broadly about who is involved in your transactions and relationships:
- Counterparties — customers, suppliers, partners, vendors
- Beneficial owners — individuals who ultimately own or control an entity
- Intermediaries — agents, brokers, or third parties involved in a transaction
- Vessels and aircraft — relevant for shipping and trade
- Research collaborators — visiting scholars, co-investigators, and collaborating institutions
The scope depends on your risk profile. Higher-risk transactions (cross-border, high-value,
or involving sanctioned jurisdictions) warrant broader screening.
Step 3: Know which lists to check
3
The lists you need depend on your jurisdiction and exposure
There is no single “sanctions list.” Multiple governments each maintain their own lists,
and they do not always overlap.
| If you are… | Check these lists |
| US-based or dealing with US goods/dollars | OFAC SDN, OFAC Consolidated (Non-SDN), BIS Entity List, BIS Denied Persons |
| UK-based | UK OFSI Sanctions List |
| EU-based | EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions |
| Australia-based | DFAT Consolidated List |
| Canada-based | Canadian Consolidated Autonomous Sanctions |
| Dealing internationally | UN Security Council Consolidated List |
Most organisations with cross-border exposure should screen against multiple lists.
A consolidated screening tool saves time by searching all relevant lists simultaneously.
Sanctions Checklist searches all major international sanctions lists in a single query, covering OFAC, BIS,
UN, EU, UK, Australian, Canadian, Swiss, Japanese, Singaporean, and other international lists.
Step 4: Prepare your search terms
4
Good screening starts with good data
For each party you are checking, gather:
- Full legal name (and any known trading names or abbreviations)
- Known aliases or alternative spellings — especially for names transliterated from non-Latin scripts
- Country of origin or incorporation — useful for narrowing results
Common pitfall: Name variations are the most common reason for missed matches.
If a name could be spelled or transliterated differently, search each variation separately.
Step 5: Run the search
5
Search your party against the relevant sanctions lists
When searching:
- Start with a broad search — this catches spelling variations, transliterations,
and partial matches that exact matching would miss
- Search aliases separately — don’t rely on the primary name alone
- Toggle PEP lists on or off depending on whether your compliance requirements include
Politically Exposed Persons screening
A search that returns no matches is still a valuable result — it forms the basis of your
“no match” documentation.
Search across all major international sanctions lists in one query
OFAC, BIS, UN, EU, UK, Australian, Canadian, Swiss, and more.
Free searches available — no credit card required.
Search now
Step 6: Review your results
6
Evaluate what the search returned
Most sanctions checks return no matches. This is normal — and documenting that outcome
is just as important as documenting a match.
If you get no matches: This is the outcome for the majority of checks.
A timestamped “no match” record demonstrates that screening was performed
and nothing was found at that point in time. Add the result to your checklist
so you have a permanent record.
If you get matches: Review each result carefully. Compare the listed entity’s
details (nationality, entity type, designation source) against what you know about your counterparty.
Not every match is a true match — common names generate false positives. Click into an entity
profile to see official source data and related entities via Wikidata enrichment.
Step 7: Build your checklist report
7
Document everything — matches and no-match searches
Whether you found matches or not, add the result to your Checklist Report.
This is where you build a structured record of your due diligence.
- Add no-match searches — when no list match is found, add the “no match”
result to your checklist. This records that you searched the name, which lists were checked,
and that nothing was found.
- Add list matches — if a match was found, add it so you can document
your assessment and any notes.
- Label the checklist — add an arrangement title or reference number
so the report is easy to retrieve later.
- Add notes — record any context or reasoning behind your assessment.
Once your checklist is complete, export it as a timestamped PDF report.
This creates a permanent, dated record of your screening — the kind of documentation
regulators and auditors look for. The PDF includes every entity you checked (with match status
and timestamps), every data source that was searched, and when each source was last updated.
Why “no match” records matter: In an enforcement action, regulators
do not just ask whether you screened — they ask for evidence. OFAC has noted that
undocumented screening provides no mitigation. A documented “no match” is as important
as a documented match, because it demonstrates that screening took place.
Generate timestamped PDF compliance reports
Build a checklist of everyone you screened, export it as a dated PDF with full audit trail,
and keep it on file. Your evidence that due diligence was done.
Start screening
Step 8: Set up ongoing monitoring
8
Screening is not a one-time activity
Sanctions lists change frequently — OFAC alone updates multiple times per week.
A one-time check at the start of a relationship is generally not sufficient for ongoing dealings.
- Add counterparties to your watchlist for daily monitoring —
you will be notified if their sanctions status changes
- Rescreen periodically when lists update or when circumstances change
- Monitor for delistings — a previously sanctioned party may have restrictions
lifted, which could affect your business decisions
Common screening mistakes
- Screening only once — lists change constantly. A one-time check at onboarding is not ongoing compliance
- Exact-match only — name variations, transliterations, and spelling differences mean exact matching misses real hits. Broad matching is essential, especially for names transliterated from Arabic, Cyrillic, or Chinese scripts
- Ignoring the 50% Rule — under OFAC rules, entities owned 50% or more by blocked persons are themselves blocked, even if they do not appear on the SDN List by name
- Checking only one list — OFAC alone is insufficient if you have EU, UK, or other international exposure
- No records — if you can’t prove you screened, you effectively didn’t. Undocumented screening provides no mitigation in an enforcement action
- Over-relying on your bank — your bank screens its own transactions, but that does not relieve you of your independent obligation to screen your counterparties and supply chain
What is a consolidated screening list?
A consolidated screening list combines multiple government lists into a single searchable database.
The US government provides an official
Consolidated Screening List (CSL)
at trade.gov, combining lists from the Departments of Commerce (BIS), Treasury (OFAC), and State.
However, the CSL covers only US government lists — no EU, UK, UN, Australian,
Canadian, or Swiss data — and provides no documentation, reporting, or audit trail.
Third-party tools like Sanctions Checklist go beyond the CSL by aggregating US lists alongside
international sanctions data in a single search. This eliminates the risk of missing a designation
on a list you didn’t think to check. Our comparison page
breaks down how different providers approach this.
This guide is provided by Sanctions Checklist for informational and educational purposes only.
It does not constitute legal, regulatory, or compliance advice.
Sanctions Checklist provides aggregated research data and does not constitute an official sanctions determination.
Users are responsible for conducting appropriate due diligence and should consult qualified
legal counsel for their specific obligations.